« TWO MUST READS ON IRAQ & WAR ON TERROR | Main | BUSH POWER GRAB CONTINUES »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb3b753ef00d834a5c8e253ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WHY JOE LIEBERMAN MUST GO MASHUP:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Nice mashup! You are right about the "one issue" coming out of msm. The media continues to portray this contest as a one issue referendum on the war. While certainly the dominant issue, I think this view masks the widespread dissatisfaction with congress, not just the administration, and is reflected in a "zero tolerance" attitude toward incumbents. People are looking for an excuse to "throw the bums out". Watching the debate, I was struck by several differences between the candidates - most notably on the topic of "earmarks". I went into the debate with an open mind, expecting to retain my mild preference for Lieberman. Lieberman's brazen support for the corrupt earmark process, and craven appeal to Connecticut voters based on his ability to bring home the earmark "pork", completely changed my thinking. Lamont took a principled stand on earmarks, which resonated with me and I suspect resonates with Connecticut voters (which - full disclosure - I am not), even if he is more left of center than I would like. Anyway, I also put a together a short video commentary on youtube and a transcript about this telling exchange in my blog post: To earmark or not to earmark, that is the question"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmmmt7kbEsg
Posted by: mw | Monday, August 07, 2006 at 01:21 PM
be sure to check out the NOW segment on earmarking which is rather good. though i must admit that i could be biased by the fact that the producer is a relative.
http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/earmarksetc.html#
should lamont win it will be interesting to see if he plays the earmark game. because not many can resist. on the bright side, senator colburn does not take earmarks which means we agree on something which means pigs can fly and there is hope for the country.
Posted by: hotpotatomash | Monday, August 07, 2006 at 02:41 PM